I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 since the main-stream news have actually guaranteed really people that are few the information regarding the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN Working Group ruled that Assange ought to never have already been arrested in britain in the beginning since there is no case, with no investigation that is genuine. Look at this and you also will understand why.
One other thing perhaps not commonly comprehended can there be is not any JURY in a rape trial in Sweden which is a SECRET TEST. Every one of the proof, most of the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. Really the only part that is public the charging and the verdict. There is certainly a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental events. So that you never ever would get to know exactly exactly how clearly the full instance is a stitch-up. Unless you look at this.
You will find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. However the key question which leaps away I have not seen asked anywhere else – is this at me– and which strangely:
Why did Anna Ardin not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood within the group that is swedish Assange when it comes to shocking red cashmere sweater she had used within the front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been likely to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who was simply trying to find Assange:
“He’s maybe maybe not right right here. He’s planned to own intercourse utilizing the girl that is cashmere night, yet not caused it to be. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she was in fact intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault so serious she had been prepared to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s life that is entire. She has also been to mention that this attack included enforced sex that is unprotected she had been worried about HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex on the and also this might have sent HIV, why did she make no attempt to alert Sofia Wilen that Wilen was at threat of her life? And exactly why ended up being Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about this to friends, without any obvious disapproval or discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her enrollment for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a really brief survey for the entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press seminar organised by a branch for the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got supper with Assange and so they have actually consensual intercourse, regarding the day that is first of. Ardin later alleges this converted into assault by surreptitious mutilation for the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him in the dais at their press seminar. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to find a party that is crayfish, so Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting out-of-doors at 02:00 and scarcely freezing using the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, based on both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in the exact same bed that is single and continue doing therefore for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep into the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin doesn’t alert her of possible assault that is sexual. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is concerned about STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other Social Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans prepares a declaration accusing Assange of rape. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had unsafe sex with her eight times formerly.
Some times later: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as evidence; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived forward never to whine of a attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration rape that is alleging that has been used by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
inspect site It is simple any particular one of a few things took place:
Ardin had been intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but did not alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, can be found in general general public and personal with him, work as his press assistant, and sleep in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to allow for him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin wanted intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” returned home early after providing him making use of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had consensual intercourse with him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s story in to a sexual assault – really easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape legislation. Wilen refused to signal.
In the authorities section on 20 August, Wilen texted a buddy at 14.25 “did n’t need to put any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The next night at 22.22 she texted “it ended up being the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then composed her own tale of intimate attack. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her tale to squeeze in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event of the torn condom. Nevertheless the condom that is torn produced does not have any trace of Assange about it. It really is impractical to wear a condom and never keep a DNA trace.
I’ve no trouble in stating that We securely think Ardin to become a liar. On her behalf tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which can be, into the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all this work detail. Rape trials in Sweden take place completely in secret. There’s no jury, plus the national federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed directly by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter the data is really so poor, as in order to cry rape would be to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying a lot of the work and life of Assange. The facts associated with whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to check out the data. If you’re perhaps not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how will you learn that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that the best way to test these things is with in court, I would personally state needless to say, you might be appropriate, we have to trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and we also should positively condemn the behaviour that is disgraceful of whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.